List-Managers (May 2001): Indexed by Date

List-Managers
May 2001
Indexed by Date

Other Indexes

Thursday 31 May 2001
- [mparcens@hushmail.com: Yahoo/Hotmail scripting vulnerability, worm propagation]
  From: Norbert Bollow <nb@thinkcoach.com>
- Re: test messages etc
  From: Tim Pierce <twp@rootsweb.com>
- Re: Cute new hoax
  From: "Michael C. Berch" <mcb@postmodern.com>
- Re: Cute new hoax
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- Re: Cute new hoax
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: Cute new hoax
  From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>
- Re: test messages etc
  From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
- Re: Cute new hoax
  From: Margaret Levine Young <margy@gurus.com>
- Re: Cute new hoax
  From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@QueerNet.ORG>
- Re: Cute new hoax
  From: JC Dill <inet-list@vo.cnchost.com>
- Re: Cute new hoax
  From: murr rhame <murr@vnet.net>
- Re: Cute new hoax
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Cute new hoax
  From: "William Silvert" <wsilvert@ipimar.pt>
- Re: test messages etc
  From: "John R Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
- Re: test messages etc
  From: Tim Pierce <twp@rootsweb.com>
Wednesday 30 May 2001
- Re: test messages etc
  From: Tim Pierce <twp@rootsweb.com>
- Re: user unknown with error 450?
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: list to honey..
  From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
- Re: test messages etc
  From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
- Re: test messages etc
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: test messages etc
  From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
- Re: user unknown with error 450?
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: test messages etc
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: test messages etc
  From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
- Re: list to honey..
  From: Norbert Bollow <nb@thinkcoach.com>
- Re: test messages etc
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: test messages etc
  From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
- Re: test messages etc
  From: Tim Pierce <twp@rootsweb.com>
- Re: test messages etc
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- Re: test messages etc
  From: JC Dill <inet-list@vo.cnchost.com>
- Re: test messages etc
  From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
Tuesday 29 May 2001
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: JC Dill <inet-list@vo.cnchost.com>
- Re: protecting archives from harvesters
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@ripco.com>
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@ripco.com>
- Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages)
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- Re: test messages etc
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages)
  From: JC Dill <inet-list@vo.cnchost.com>
- Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages)
  From: Aumont <serge.aumont@cru.fr>
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: "Roger Fajman" <RAF@CU.NIH.GOV>
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: "Roger Fajman" <RAF@CU.NIH.GOV>
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
- Re: list to honey..
  From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
- Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages)
  From: Tim Pierce <twp@rootsweb.com>
- Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages)
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages)
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages)
  From: JC Dill <inet-list@vo.cnchost.com>
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: JC Dill <inet-list@vo.cnchost.com>
- Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages)
  From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>
- Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages)
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: list to honey..
  From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>
Monday 28 May 2001
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@ripco.com>
- Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages)
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@ripco.com>
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@ripco.com>
- list to honey..
  From: "albert" <emmanuel@mwt.net>
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
- YES ! dual active replys..this is my quest...
  From: "albert" <emmanuel@mwt.net>
- Re: test messages etc
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: "Bernie Cosell" <bernie@fantasyfarm.com>
- Re: test messages etc
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@ripco.com>
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
- Re: test messages etc
  From: Roger Burton West <roger@firedrake.org>
- Re: test messages etc
  From: "Bernie Cosell" <bernie@fantasyfarm.com>
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: JC Dill <inet-list@vo.cnchost.com>
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: test messages etc
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@ripco.com>
- Re: test messages etc
  From: Tom Neff <tneff@panix.com>
- Re: Reply-To and usability measurements
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Reply-To and usability measurements
  From: Norbert Bollow <nb@thinkcoach.com>
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: Keith Flippin <kflippin@pond.com>
Saturday 26 May 2001
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: lets forget the silly test,...and ,
  From: Mike Yuhas <mike@folkradio.org>
- lets forget the silly test,...and ,
  From: "albert" <emmanuel@mwt.net>
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: JC Dill <inet-list@vo.cnchost.com>
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: "Michael C. Berch" <mcb@postmodern.com>
- Re:test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: Charlie Summers <charlie@lofcom.com>
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@ripco.com>
- test message,or reply's to, which worse?
  From: "albert" <emmanuel@mwt.net>
- Re: filtering (was Re: test)
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- filtering (was Re: test)
  From: Keith Flippin <kflippin@pond.com>
Friday 25 May 2001
- configuation pointer needed.
  From: "albert" <emmanuel@mwt.net>
- Re: test
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- [no subject]
  From: "albert" <emmanuel@mwt.net>
- test
  From: "albert" <emmanuel@mwt.net>
Wednesday 23 May 2001
- user unknown with error 450?
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: Fw: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: Mikael Hansen <meh@dnai.com>
Tuesday 22 May 2001
- More on: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: "William Silvert" <wsilvert@ipimar.pt>
Monday 21 May 2001
- Re: Fw: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: Fw: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: Tim Pierce <twp@rootsweb.com>
- Fw: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: "William Silvert" <wsilvert@ipimar.pt>
Sunday 20 May 2001
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: Charlie Summers <charlie@lofcom.com>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: arielle@taronga.com (Stephanie da Silva)
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: Charlie Summers <charlie@lofcom.com>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@QueerNet.ORG>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: Charlie Summers <charlie@lofcom.com>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: "Bernie Cosell" <bernie@fantasyfarm.com>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: Tim Pierce <twp@rootsweb.com>
Saturday 19 May 2001
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@ripco.com>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: JC Dill <inet-list@vo.cnchost.com>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@QueerNet.ORG>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: Tom Coradeschi <tcora@skylands.ibmwr.org>
- Fw: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: "William Silvert" <wsilvert@ipimar.pt>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: "Bernie Cosell" <bernie@fantasyfarm.com>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@QueerNet.ORG>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: Tim Pierce <twp@rootsweb.com>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: Tim Pierce <twp@rootsweb.com>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: Tim Pierce <twp@rootsweb.com>
Friday 18 May 2001
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@ripco.com>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@QueerNet.ORG>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: "Bernie Cosell" <bernie@fantasyfarm.com>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
  From: "William Silvert" <wsilvert@ipimar.pt>
Saturday 12 May 2001
- For your amusement...
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
Wednesday 09 May 2001
- Re: Yahho's [apparent] decision to drop Adult groups
  From: Alvin Oga <alvin@planet.fef.com>
- Re: Yahho's [apparent] decision to drop Adult groups
  From: Joe Smith <jms@tardis.tymnet.com>
Tuesday 08 May 2001
- Re: autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem)
  From: "Roger Fajman" <RAF@CU.NIH.GOV>
Tuesday 08 May 2001
- Re: autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem)
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- Re: autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem)
  From: James M Galvin <galvin@acm.org>
- Re: autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem)
  From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
Monday 07 May 2001
- Re: autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem)
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- So called opt-in
  From: "John R Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
- Re: Mailing lists for -emarketing
  From: "John R Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
- Re: Mailing lists for -emarketing
  From: "Larry Olin Horn" <hornlo@lohnet.org>
- Re: Mailing lists for -emarketing
  From: "Jessica Callender" <JessicaCallender@worldnet.att.net>
Saturday 05 May 2001
- Re: targeted spam (was mailing lists for e-marketing)
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@ripco.com>
Saturday 05 May 2001
- Re: targeted spam (was mailing lists for e-marketing)
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- targeted spam (was mailing lists for e-marketing)
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@ripco.com>
- Re: Mailing lists for -emarketing
  From: JC Dill <inet-list@vo.cnchost.com>
- Re: Mailing lists for -emarketing
  From: "Jessica Callender" <JessicaCallender@worldnet.att.net>
- Re: autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem)
  From: James M Galvin <galvin@acm.org>
- causes of multiple messages [WAS: Re: senate.gov problem]
  From: Omar Thameen <omar@clifford.inch.com>
- Re: autoresponders and vacation notices
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@ripco.com>
- Re: senate.gov problem - update
  From: Sharon Tucci <sharon@listhost.net>
Friday 04 May 2001
- Re: autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem)
  From: Tim Pierce <twp@rootsweb.com>
- Re: senate.gov problem
  From: Tim Pierce <twp@rootsweb.com>
- Re: autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem)
  From: Sharon Tucci <sharon@listhost.net>
- autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem)
  From: James M Galvin <galvin@acm.org>
- Re:Mailing lists for -emarketing
  From: Sharon Tucci <sharon@listhost.net>
- Re:Mailing lists for -emarketing
  From: Margaret Levine Young <margy@gurus.com>
- Re:Mailing lists for -emarketing
  From: Charlie Summers <charlie@lofcom.com>
- Re: Mailing lists for -emarketing
  From: "John R Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
- Mailing lists for -emarketing
  From: "Jessica Callender" <JessicaCallender@worldnet.att.net>
Thursday 03 May 2001
- Re: senate.gov problem
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- Re: New mailing list host?
  From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
- Re: senate.gov problem
  From: Sharon Tucci <sharon@listhost.net>
- Re: senate.gov problem
  From: Sharon Tucci <sharon@listhost.net>
- Re: senate.gov problem
  From: James M Galvin <galvin@acm.org>
- Re: senate.gov problem
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: New mailing list host?
  From: Bob Comperini <robertc@qnet.com>
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it
  From: Sharon Tucci <sharon@listhost.net>
- senate.gov problem
  From: Sharon Tucci <sharon@listhost.net>
- Re: New mailing list host?
  From: "Philip Busey" <veld@veld.com>
- Re: New mailing list host?
  From: Tom Coradeschi <tcora@skylands.ibmwr.org>
- New mailing list host?
  From: Bob Comperini <robertc@qnet.com>
- Re: Iname/mail.com effed up again?
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: Iname/mail.com effed up again?
  From: "Nathan J. Mehl" <memory@blank.org>
Tuesday 01 May 2001
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it
  From: James M Galvin <galvin@acm.org>
- Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed
  From: Norbert Bollow <nb@thinkcoach.com>
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it
  From: Norbert Bollow <nb@thinkcoach.com>

Other Indexes

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.2