Tim Pierce wrote,
| The Berkeley `vacation' algorithm seems to
| have held up pretty well over the years: send an autoreply only if
| (a) the recipient is personally listed in the `To' or `Cc' headers;
| (b) the mail does not have a `Precedence' of `list', `bulk' or
| `junk'; and
| (c) it doesn't come from an address that is likely to
| be a daemon, such as `mailer-daemon', `postmaster', `owner-' and
| `-request' addresses.
Isn't "the address to which the autoreply would be sent has not already
been sent a copy of the current autoreply text" part of the algorithm?
References:
|
|
