List-Managers: Re: autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem)

List-Managers
(May 2001)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem)
From:	James M Galvin <galvin @ acm . org>
Date:	Sat, 05 May 2001 08:44:05 -0400 (EDT)
To:	Tim Pierce <twp @ rootsweb . com>
Cc:	List-Managers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to:	<20010504174808.F86822@ma-1.rootsweb.com>


On Fri, 4 May 2001, Tim Pierce wrote:

    The Berkeley `vacation' algorithm seems to
    have held up pretty well over the years: ....

    I would not mind seeing those requirements codified in the next
    revision of the DSN standard.

Just for clarity, DSN is RFC1894 and refers to delivery status.  MDN is
RFC2298 and refers to after delivery conditions, e.g., vacation notices
and autoresponders.

Jim

Follow-Ups:

Re: autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem)
From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>

References:

Re: autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem)
From: Tim Pierce <twp@rootsweb.com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	causes of multiple messages [WAS: Re: senate.gov problem] From: Omar Thameen <omar@clifford.inch.com>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: Mailing lists for -emarketing From: "Jessica Callender" <JessicaCallender@worldnet.att.net>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: autoresponders and vacation notices From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@ripco.com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem) From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>