BINGO!! this is what i had in mind to begin with!!
so, is there a dual reply or way to add this to one's list..
thanks JC !
albert.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: list-managers-owner@GreatCircle.COM
> [mailto:list-managers-owner@GreatCircle.COM]On Behalf Of JC Dill
> Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 1:24 PM
> To: list-managers@GreatCircle.COM
> Subject: Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse?
>
>
> On 08:16 AM 5/28/01, David W. Tamkin wrote:
>
> >Blind faith in reply-to-all to do the right thing magically without the
> >user's reviewing its choices is not perfect either. We agree
> that no mail
> >client has a "read my mind, know all of netiquette, know the list rules,
> >predict the text I plan to type, know the preferences of the
> poster to whom
> >I'm replying, and figure out the exact right way to address my response"
> >command.
>
> Hmmm. It seems we have an opportunity to write an RFC that would spec a
> "reply-to-list" header and a "reply-to-author" header, and discuss how to
> implement selection of these two reply options in common email
> clients. When the reader has two "reply to" buttons active when reading
> any given list post, and can easily and quickly click on the appropriate
> button for the reply they plan to send (or even change it later, while
> composing, if the reply changes tone while they are writing), it
> would make
> it a lot easier for everyone to send the reply where they want it to go.
>
> Or has this already been done? I'm a bit behind in keeping up with email
> related RFCs.
>
> jc
>
>
References:
|
|
