On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 07:18:19PM -0700, J C Lawrence wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2001 17:49:19 -0700
> Roger B A Klorese <Roger> wrote:
> > At 05:06 PM 10/20/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>
> >> Bounces have the unique quality of have a null return envelope.
> >> Filter on that and you'll have no problem. (
>
> > With the number of sites violating RFCs and rejecting
> > null-envelope bounce messages, my list owners are not getting
> > their lists' bounces. I am seriously considering putting in a
> > return address on them from here on.
>
> There's a simple handling for such: null route their mail. If/when
> they fix their configs, remove the filter.
There is a RBL-like blacklist service for sites that reject null
envelopes:
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/policy-dsn.html
David
--
David Shaw | dshaw@jabberwocky.com | WWW http://www.jabberwocky.com/
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
"There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
We don't believe this to be a coincidence." - Jeremy S. Anderson
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
