On 10/22/01 5:58 PM, "blaise@scadian.net" <blaise@scadian.net> wrote:
> My opinion is that they read the RFC precisely and you missed a spot.
> This does not seem to be an implementation limit but a configured site-
> policy limitation (as far as we can tell).
Wasn't it on this list where we were having the discussion about not
accepting mail from <>, even though the spec says to?
Are we really saying it's okay for us to violate the RFC for anti-spam
purposes, but not Yahoo?
Not that yahoo is, unlike the people rejecting <>. But that seems to be what
I'm hearing here.
Follow-Ups:
-
Re: Yahoo
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@queernet.org>
References:
|
|
