Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(December 2001)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Why did List-Managers silently change software, number and
From: Brent Chapman <Brent @ GreatCircle . COM>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 13:32:30 -0800
To: list-managers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.2.20011218075704.02f85610@127.0.0.1>
References: <20011218132004.CB6C22C374@mycroft.greatcircle.com><20011218132004.CB6C22C374@mycroft.greatcircle.com><5.1.0.14.2.20011218075704.02f85610@127.0.0.1>

In the immortal words of Monty Python, "Wait! I'm not dead yet!"...  :-)

Unfortunately, while I'd like to blame this weekend's glitches on 
somebody else, I can't; it's all my fault.

I am, indeed, moving to Australia, but I don't leave for another 
couple of weeks.  The various domains and lists that I administer are 
all staying here in the USA, however.  The pair of BSD boxes that 
they've been running on for years are getting kinda long in the 
tooth, and have started getting unreliable lately.  While they were 
in the closet under my staircase, that didn't really matter, because 
I could go kick them at will, as needed.  Simon Cooper (my coauthor 
on Building Internet Firewalls, 2nd Edition) has been good enough to 
offer my machines a home while I'm in Oz.  I don't want to stick him 
with a pile of ever-flakier hardware to deal with, though, so I'm 
trying to get everything moved onto a single, up-to-date, reliable 
machine before I leave.

As part of putting everything onto a single machine, I wanted to 
switch to Majordomo2, for two reasons.  First, the original Majordomo 
is essentially dead, unmaintained code at this point, and I wanted to 
get some experience with Majordomo2 before it is officially 
"released".  Second, I'm hoping that using Majordomo2 will encourage 
its developers to actually go ahead and release it.  Third, 
Majordomo2 supports virtual domains much more easily than Majordomo, 
and I needed that capability in order to get everything onto a single 
machine.

Ideally, I would have made this change weeks ago, to allow more "soak 
time" before I leave, but I've been busy with other more urgent 
preparations.  C'est la vie.

So anyway, I've fixed (I think) the digest numbering, and switched 
all digest subscribers from MIME-format (the default chosen by the 
Majordomo2 conversion script) to text-format digests.  Next, I'm 
going to work on getting the archives back online and up to date. 
I'm sure there will be other glitches, but please bear with me as I 
work through them.


-Brent
--
Brent Chapman <brent@greatcircle.com> -- Great Circle Associates, Inc.
Specializing in IT infrastructure for Silicon Valley startups since 1989
For info about our services, please see http://www.greatcircle.com/startups/



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: "purging" or ____? (was Re: Is there a FAQ?)
From: Beartooth <karhunhammas@Lserv.com>
Next: Re: "purging" or ____? (was Re: Is there a FAQ?)
From: "Bernie Cosell" <bernie@fantasyfarm.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Why did List-Managers silently change software, number and
From: JC Dill <inet-list@vo.cnchost.com>
Next: Majordomo 2.0
From: Jon Parise <jon@csh.rit.edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com