Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(March 2002)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: ListProc has been open-sourced
From: Nick Simicich <njs @ scifi . squawk . com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 21:04:43 -0500
To: list-managers @ greatcircle . com (list managers)
In-reply-to: <v04210108b8b1ae4b29dc@[10.0.1.2]>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020310190534.0e856060@127.0.0.1><5.1.0.14.2.20020309194152.02ee03f8@127.0.0.1><200202151345.g1FDjRY02144@csa.bu.edu><3C6AFC82.83ECB596@loudcloud.com><5.1.0.14.2.20020310190534.0e856060@127.0.0.1>

At 11:47 AM 2002-03-11 +1100, Brent Chapman wrote:

>>>Have you looked at Majordomo2 ?
>>
>>I was on the developers list for quite a while.  It seemed that Mj2 was 
>>not ready for prime time and might never be.
>
>I switched all the GreatCircle.COM lists (including List-Manglers) over to 
>Mj2 a about 3 months ago.  We've been pretty happy with it. The only area 
>where we've had some difficulties has been with digests; I haven't had 
>time to dig into it yet, but the digest code seems somewhat flaky (one of 
>our more active digests, for example, keeps getting stuck in a time warp, 
>with old messages reappearing in the digest).

I guess I'd consider this sort of problem to be a show stopper.  This is 
the sort of thing I was referring to when I said that I thought it might 
not be ready for prime time.

>I'd have to say that the Mj2 documentation is already far better than the 
>Mj1 documentation ever was...  In my opinion, about all that Mj2 needs in 
>order to be "released" is for somebody to package it up into the common 
>distribution formats (Redhat .rpm and Debian .deb, to begin with).

Well, it is not hard for doc to be better than MJ1's doc was.  The point to 
me is that there are a huge number of MLMs out there at this point, whereas 
back when I picked Majordomo, there was MJ and Listproc and listproc, even 
the "lite" version had this whacky license. Now there are a whole bunch of 
free ones. I at least want to pick one where the basic functions are 
straightforward and reasonably reliable.

So far I have installed listproc and listar and I have mailman - it turns 
out it comes with the Redhat system.  Someone else has suggested sympa in 
private e-mail.

I suspect that every one of these packages have "doc" that is better than 
MJ1. I guess I'm just indecisive.

--
War is an ugly thing, but it is not the ugliest of things. The decayed and 
degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is 
worth war is much worse. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to 
fight, nothing he cares about more than his own personal safety, is a 
miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made so by the 
exertions of better men than himself. -- John Stuart Mill
Nick Simicich - njs@scifi.squawk.com




Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: ListProc has been open-sourced
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@queernet.org>
Next: Re: ListProc has been open-sourced
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@queernet.org>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: ListProc has been open-sourced
From: Brent Chapman <Brent@GreatCircle.COM>
Next: Re: ListProc has been open-sourced
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@queernet.org>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com