On Fri, 17 May 2002 10:00:06 -0600
Mike Avery <mavery@mail.otherwhen.com> wrote:
> On 17 May 2002 at 4:38, Sharon Tucci wrote:
>> Here are a few of my current pet peeves:
> In researching Spam Assassin, I found many mass mailers are very upset
> about it. Many users are delighted. Evidently it cuts more than 99%
> of the spam. Some people don't mind missing some legitimate emails as
> well.
SPAM assassin has a roughly 0.002% false positive rate here (~3K
messages checked per day). The false negative rate is climbing alas,
but that is solely due to the increased rate of mailmerged SPAM I'm
getting (my address in To:. address and/or name in message body, etc).
I can live with a 0.002% false positive rate quite comfortably,
especially as its the very rare exception among those false positives
that I actually want to read (hasn't happened yet this year).
--
J C Lawrence
---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
claw@kanga.nu He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|