On 5/21/02 10:00 PM, "J C Lawrence" <claw@kanga.nu> wrote:
> This problem is implicit in SPAM being defined behaviourally. People
> don't have universal views on behaviour.
They don't have universal views on spam, either. Get 10 people together, and
you'll get 11 definitions of what it is. Unfortunately, too often, it boils
down to "the stuff I don't want to see", which is another reason why
draining this swamp is so nasty. Everyone wants spam killed -- but nobody
agrees on what it is, except in very general ways that leave nobody really
satisfied.
--
Chuq Von Rospach, Architech
chuqui@plaidworks.com -- http://www.chuqui.com/
Yes, I am an agent of Satan, but my duties
are largely ceremonial.
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
