Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(May 2002)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: one person's spam is another's passion (was "Charge?")
From: Nick Simicich <njs @ scifi . squawk . com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 13:41:51 -0400
To: list-managers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <200205221115.g4MBFei03446@quill.local>
References: <200205220552.g4M5q4E20528@pop2a.ripco.com><200205220552.g4M5q4E20528@pop2a.ripco.com>

At 01:15 PM 2002-05-22 +0200, Norbert Bollow wrote:

>Sounds like a good idea to me.  Give each user the option to
>configure rules that will result in the message being rejected
>already during the SMTP conversation, so that it'll not be
>necessary to generate a bounce.  Yes, this will probably require
>implementing a new MTA which would be designed specifically to
>make this approach possible, without introducing security risks.

Postfix pretty much allows this now.

--
War is an ugly thing, but it is not the ugliest of things. The decayed and 
degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is 
worth war is much worse. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to 
fight, nothing he cares about more than his own personal safety, is a 
miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made so by the 
exertions of better men than himself. -- John Stuart Mill
Nick Simicich - njs@scifi.squawk.com




References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Charge?
From: Beartooth <karhunhammas@Lserv.com>
Next: "80% hit delete ..."
From: Beartooth <karhunhammas@Lserv.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: one person's spam is another's passion (was "Charge?")
From: Norbert Bollow <nb@thinkcoach.com>
Next: Re: Charge?
From: Beartooth <karhunhammas@Lserv.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com