Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(May 2002)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: one person's spam is another's passion (was "Charge?")
From: J C Lawrence <claw @ kanga . nu>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 21:59:09 -0700
To: Berg Oswell <berg @ eskimo . com>
Cc: list-managers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: Message from Berg Oswell <berg@eskimo.com> of "Thu, 23 May 2002 12:40:33 PDT." <200205231940.MAA28887@eskimo.com>
References: <200205231940.MAA28887@eskimo.com>

On Thu, 23 May 2002 12:40:33 -0700 (PDT) 
Berg Oswell <berg@eskimo.com> wrote:

> IMO, the best test of what email to send is simple...did the person
> affirmatively request the mailing?  If not, then it shouldn't be sent.

There's a middle ground.  Example:

  Bubba posts on a list concerning some problems he's having with XYZ
  part of his life (his car, his wife, his house, his computer, his
  software, whatever).  His post is topical to that list.

  Boffo, who is a member of that list, emails Bubba privately offering
  his or his companies products/services/whatever to aid Bubba with his
  problems.

It can be annoying.  It can also be very helpful.  Mostly its an
attitudinal difference on Boffo's part. There's little clear distinction
between them.

-- 
J C Lawrence                
---------(*)                Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. 
claw@kanga.nu               He lived as a devil, eh?		  
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/  Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: one person's spam is another's passion (was "Charge?")
From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
Next: [no subject]
From: "seniorsnetworkuk" <seniors@oneuk.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: one person's spam is another's passion (was "Charge?")
From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
Next: Re: one person's spam is another's passion (was "Charge?")
From: Berg Oswell <berg@eskimo.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com