On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 23:55:46 -0700
Shannon Appelcline <shannon@erzo.org> wrote:
> For all of Roger's discrimination against high-brow lists that weed
> out the weak like chaff, I have to say, as a participant, JC's list
> work damned well.
Thanks.
> If you keep administering for the lowest common denominator, you end
> up with the lowest common denominator. Congrats.
One of the things I see few lists do is to define the purpose of the
list, along with at least some sense of the indicators of success or
failure in achieving that purpose. If you're going to run a list it
seems reasonable that you should know why, and that you should then be
able to know whether or not you're accomplishing that purpose.
--
J C Lawrence
---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
claw@kanga.nu He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
