Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(July 2002)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: MUA elitism
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk @ queernet . org>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 16:37:56 -0700
To: J C Lawrence <claw @ kanga . nu>
Cc: list-managers @ greatcircle . com
References: <1025904044.smmsdV1.1.0@localhost> <5391.1025910377@kanga.nu> <3D262790.7060802@queernet.org> <5607.1025911275@kanga.nu>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020512 Netscape/7.0b1

J C Lawrence wrote:
> I read your post as stating that was the member's purpose as distinct
> from the list' purpose.

No, sorry I was unclear -- it was the specific purpose of many of those 
lists to provide a "home base" for people who have XYZ in common, not to 
be topic-restricted to XYZ.

>>And at our site it has succeded more than 50% of the time.
> 
> 
> Really?  You have taken purposive lists and forked them successfully as
> above, or you have taken lists that decayed into salon lists nd found
> that they can survive as salon lists?  The two are quite different.

We have taken topic-based lists and forked a salon to go with them, and 
found the main list's traffic reduced by 20-50% and the salon's traffic 
at anywhere from the difference to 2-3x the difference.




Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: MUA elitism
From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
Next: Re: MUA elitism
From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: MUA elitism
From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
Next: Re: MUA elitism
From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com