--On Friday, July 12, 2002 3:14 PM -0700 J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu> wrote:
> A couple points:
>
> 1) 1153 doesn't specify header trimming.
...
>
> Given that 1153 digests don't mandate header trimming... [etc]
>From http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1153.html :
Each enclosed message is a conventional message consisting of a
header and body, separated by a blank line. If they exist in the
original message header, the following lines must be retained
as-is in the reconstructed header: Date:, From:, To:, Cc:,
Subject:, Message-ID:, and Keywords:, rearranged to appear in that
order. Retaining the Summary: line is optional. Lines include
continuation lines as defined in the RFCs. All other header lines
should be discarded, especially Received lines. All leading and
trailing blank lines should be removed from the message body. The
message body may be scanned to replace with a blank the first
character of any lines of exactly and only 30 hyphens.
"1153 Got It Right"(tm)
>> The one thing I wish my mail client gave me - if I do a web based one
>> of my own some day I will hack this in - is the ability to roll along
>> reading that honest text digest, and reply to the list OR an
>> individual poster (a couple of buttons in the subheader would do it)
>> without breaking stride.
>
> Yup. Several MUAs do that.
Great! What's an example of one?
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
