Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(July 2002)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: multiple addresses in (was AOL and odd) Reply-to
From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier @ ripco . com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 20:01:35 -0500
To: "list-managers" <list-managers @ greatcircle . com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020716160955.27ecfb58@parrot-int.squawk.com> <16166.1026860526@kanga.nu>

Nick gave the example,

| > Reply-to: listname@listdomain, posting-user@example.com

JCL commented,

| Having [mutiple addresses in] Reply-To is a Good ... and Damned Useful
[Thing].

It seems to me, though, that the list membership would be better served with
this form:

 Reply-To: postauthor@its.domain, listname@listserver.domain

because the MUAs with which I'm familiar make it anywhere from slightly easier
to far easier for the respondent to remove addresses from the right of the
reply's To: than from the left.






References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: AOL and odd Reply-to
From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
Next: Re: AOL and odd Reply-to
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@queernet.org>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: AOL and odd Reply-to
From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@ripco.com>
Next: Re: AOL and odd Reply-to
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@queernet.org>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com