List-Managers: Re: AOL and odd Reply-to

List-Managers
(July 2002)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: AOL and odd Reply-to
From:	"Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk @ queernet . org>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jul 2002 18:40:03 -0700
To:	J C Lawrence <claw @ kanga . nu>
Cc:	Nick Simicich <njs @ scifi . squawk . com>,list-managers <list-managers @ greatcircle . com>
References:	<5.1.0.14.2.20020716160955.27ecfb58@parrot-int.squawk.com> <16166.1026860526@kanga.nu> <16715.1026862136@kanga.nu>
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.1a+) Gecko/20020713

J C Lawrence wrote:
>   Having multiple addresses in Reply-To is a Good Thing and Damned
>   Useful.

However, there are still packages out there -- Majordomo 1?  I can't 
remember -- that think it's illegal.

References:

AOL and odd Reply-to
From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
Re: AOL and odd Reply-to
From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
Re: AOL and odd Reply-to
From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: multiple addresses in (was AOL and odd) Reply-to From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@ripco.com>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: AOL and odd Reply-to From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: AOL and odd Reply-to From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: AOL and odd Reply-to From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>