On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 21:50:29 -0400
Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com> wrote:
> At 04:28 PM 2002-07-16 -0700, J C Lawrence wrote:
>> Rephrased the way I actually meant:
>> Having multiple addresses in Reply-To is a Good Thing and Damned
>> Useful.
> And AOL will throw your mail on the floor if the mail seems to come
> from an AOL user and is going back to AOL, or at least that is what we
> seem to have discovered.
<nod>
In the general case, at least for Mailman, this won't be a problem as
Mailman will only collect addresses in Reply-To if there's an address in
Reply-To already. What it won't do is create a new Reply-To when there
wasn't one before, and then populate it with multiple addresses.
> I wonder if this is an issue where they presume that AOL users can't
> set reply-to, so any mail with a reply-to inside of AOL must be
> forged?
Quite possibly.
--
J C Lawrence
---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
claw@kanga.nu He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
