Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(August 2002)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: m.gmane.org
From: Russ Allbery <rra @ stanford . edu>
Organization: The Eyrie
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 15:53:56 -0700
To: List Managers <List-Managers @ greatcircle . com>
In-reply-to: <B96F0945.4B53B%chuqui@plaidworks.com> (Chuq Von Rospach'smessage of "Thu, 01 Aug 2002 15:50:29 -0700")
References: <B96F0945.4B53B%chuqui@plaidworks.com>
User-agent: Gnus/5.090005 (Oort Gnus v0.05) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter,sparc-sun-solaris2.6)

Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com> writes:

> I do that, also. Whether it's user-choosable, I dunno. But one of the
> things that isn't currently being talked about (nor, I think, should it
> be) is cloaking content, like .sigs. So if it's in your .sig, it'll be
> public, no matter what the list server does.

> Would that be "good enough"?

If mail from me does not say:

    From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>

and instead says something else, I'm going to be upset.  I don't mind
munging on web archives; that's not the primary presentation of the mail
and isn't where replies are generated from.  But when the mail arrives in
the mailbox of another user of the mailing list, I want the address in the
regular mail headers of that message to be mine, not some other address
that the mail server edited in for me.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: m.gmane.org
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
Next: Re: m.gmane.org
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: m.gmane.org
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
Next: Re: m.gmane.org
From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com