On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:24:12 -0700
Michael C Berch <mcb@postmodern.com> wrote:
> It is definitely not either SpamAssassin or SpamBouncer, both of which
> merely mark up the message for later processing by Procmail or a MUA.
> Neither should be giving an error at the SMTP layer.
SpamAssassin can be run at the MTA layer, providing hints to the MTA on
SPAM qualities at receipt time for immediate bouncing. This is not an
unusual configuration.
--
J C Lawrence
---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
claw@kanga.nu He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
