On Thursday, August 15, 2002, at 12:08 AM, J C Lawrence wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:24:12 -0700
> Michael C Berch <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> It is definitely not either SpamAssassin or SpamBouncer, both of which
>> merely mark up the message for later processing by Procmail or a MUA.
>> Neither should be giving an error at the SMTP layer.
> SpamAssassin can be run at the MTA layer, providing hints to the MTA on
> SPAM qualities at receipt time for immediate bouncing. This is not an
> unusual configuration.
Oh... right! The spamass-milter. Forgot about that. It should not
generate "Error 129", so far as I know, though.