Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(August 2002)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: The gmane issue
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui @ plaidworks . com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 14:10:51 -0700
To: Barry Warsaw <bwarsaw @ python . org>,List Managers <List-Managers @ greatcircle . com>
In-reply-to: <15709.25475.854743.499074@anthem.wooz.org>
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.0.2006

On 8/16/02 1:41 PM, "Barry A. Warsaw" <bwarsaw@python.org> wrote:

> I agree that a header is probably fine, but /please/ let's not make
> the same mistake as with "X-No-Archive: yes" -- let's make a positive
> assertion instead.  Something like "X-Archive-Policy: (descriptive
> string)".

Defnitely. IMHO, the existance of the header means "don't do it until you
make sure you get permission". X-No-Header got that all sideways.


-- 
Chuq Von Rospach, Architech
chuqui@plaidworks.com -- http://www.chuqui.com/

The Cliff's Notes Cliff's Notes on Hamlet:
    And they all died happily ever after




References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: The gmane issue
From: "Tegels, Kent" <KTegels@hdrinc.com>
Next: Re: The gmane issue
From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@panix.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: The gmane issue
From: bwarsaw@python.org (Barry A. Warsaw)
Next: Re: The gmane issue
From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com