List-Managers: Re: The gmane issue

List-Managers
(August 2002)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: The gmane issue
From:	J C Lawrence <claw @ kanga . nu>
Date:	Sat, 17 Aug 2002 01:36:28 -0700
To:	Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui @ plaidworks . com>
Cc:	Aditya <aditya @ grot . org>,List Managers <List-Managers @ greatcircle . com>
In-reply-to:	Message from Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com> of "Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:56:57 PDT." <B9828AF9.4D70B%chuqui@plaidworks.com>
References:	<B9828AF9.4D70B%chuqui@plaidworks.com>

On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:56:57 -0700 
Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com> wrote:

> If that exists, then the string either explains the policy or points
> to a URL that explains the policy. If that exists, you don't archive
> that list without following the policy.

> Too simple?

And too effective.

-- 
J C Lawrence                
---------(*)                Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. 
claw@kanga.nu               He lived as a devil, eh?		  
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/  Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.

References:

Re: The gmane issue
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: Better mailing list archives (Re: Listing list-managers on gmane) From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: Mailing List Mirror/Archive RFC? [Was Re: The gmane issue] From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: The gmane issue From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: The gmane issue From: Thomas Gramstad <thomas@ifi.uio.no>