Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(August 2002)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: The gmane issue
From: Thomas Gramstad <thomas @ ifi . uio . no>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 18:16:41 +0200 (MEST)
To: list-managers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <29703.1029519145@kanga.nu>
Reply-to: Thomas Gramstad <thomas @ ifi . uio . no>

On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, J C Lawrence wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:09:33 -0700
> aditya  <aditya@grot.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 10:04:41AM -0700, JC Dill wrote:

>>> If so, do you support the idea of this file being made available 1,
>>> 2, or all 3 of the following ways:

>>> A) As a separate file that can be requested from the list server
>>> (like an info file) via email; B) A file to be found on the list
>>> server's website (like robots.txt) if there is a website; and C)
>>> Included in the welcome message.

>> D) Included as a header AND a machine-parseable line in the body of
>> the confirmation AND welcome message.

> I pick #D.

Why pick?  We'll never be able to enforce compliance by listserver
producers anyway.
  -->  E) All/any of the above.

Thomas Gramstad
thomas@ifi.uio.no




References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: The gmane issue
From: Thomas Gramstad <thomas@ifi.uio.no>
Next: Re: The gmane issue
From: bwarsaw@python.org (Barry A. Warsaw)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Mailing List Mirror/Archive RFC? [Was Re: The gmane issue]
From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
Next: Re: The gmane issue
From: Norbert Bollow <nb@cisto.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com