On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
> There's already a defacto standard of X-No-Archive for "do not
> archive this message".
>
> How about creating another header:
>
> X-No-Archive-List: (descriptive string).
X-No-Archive-List: is too similar to X-No-Archive-List:. They
would be confused with each other. Also, X-No-Archive-List: is
not accurate: some of us want to allow private archives (available
only for the users of a particular machine, organization or
intranet), but not public ones. Perhaps X-No-Public-Archive-List:
would work.
Thomas Gramstad
thomas@ifi.uio.no
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
