Re: The gmane issue

["Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk @ queernet . org>]

Thomas Gramstad wrote:

>  
>
>X-No-Archive-List: is too similar to X-No-Archive-List:.  They
>would be confused with each other.  Also, X-No-Archive-List: is
>not accurate: some of us want to allow private archives (available
>only for the users of a particular machine, organization or
>intranet), but not public ones.  Perhaps X-No-Public-Archive-List:
>would work.
>

Besides, wouldn't it make more sense as X-List-No-Public-Archive: -- 
that is, put it in the List-* namespace?