At 12:30 PM 2002-08-19 -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
>This is probably true, but I doubt you can come up with a default that
>will satisfy even a majority of users, because they all want something
>different. This is also probably more true across listserver
>applications, which might be self selecting users with similar privacy
>requirements.
I disagree. The clear majority wish for this setting would be "hell
no". None of the people who pay me for service want this. YMMV.
It is not even close. No one I have talked to outside of a few on this
list think that this is a good idea. And if we allow a vote per list, the
only vote that counts, most likely, is queernet, since they have so many
lists and they have strict privacy guidelines that would most likely
disallow this for the vast majority of their lists.
-
My grandfather used to tell me, "When three people tell you that you are
drunk, lie down, you're drunk." My grandfather trusted people.
Nick Simicich mailto:njs@scifi.squawk.com
http://scifi.squawk.com/njs.html -- Stop by and Light Up The World!
References:
|
|
