Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(August 2002)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: The gmane issue
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui @ plaidworks . com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 11:15:03 -0700
To: Norbert Bollow <nb @ cisto . com>
Cc: thomas @ ifi . uio . no, inet-list @ vo . cnchost . com,List-Managers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <200208191738.g7JHc0i18428@quill.local>


On Monday, August 19, 2002, at 10:38  AM, Norbert Bollow wrote:
> Actually I believe that such a responsibility exists only where
> the list-owners want the situation to be different from the default
> that is implied by copyright law, namely:
>
> * Without explicit permission, no-one is allowed to mirror the list,
>   or create public archives.
>
> * Just telling people about the existence of the list (by mentioning
>   it in a directory of lists) is ok even without explicit permission.

Why do you believe those are implied by copyright law? I'm curious what 
your rationale is.

>
-- 
Chuq Von Rospach, Architech
chuqui@plaidworks.com -- http://www.chuqui.com/

IMHO: Jargon. Acronym for In My Humble Opinion. Used to flag as an 
opinion
something that is clearly from context an opinion to everyone except the
mentally dense. Opinions flagged by IMHO are actually rarely humble. 
IMHO.
     (source: third unabridged dictionary of chuqui-isms).




Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: idea: Google Lists
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@magpage.com>
Next: Re: The gmane issue
From: Charlie Summers <charlie@lofcom.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: The gmane issue
From: Norbert Bollow <nb@cisto.com>
Next: Re: The gmane issue
From: Charlie Summers <charlie@lofcom.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com