Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(August 2002)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: The gmane issue
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui @ plaidworks . com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 15:03:31 -0700
To: JC Dill <inet-list @ vo . cnchost . com>
Cc: List-Managers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <5.0.0.25.2.20020819135356.03973e10@pop3.vo.cnchost.com>


On Monday, August 19, 2002, at 02:04  PM, JC Dill wrote:

> >Mailing list mirrors and public archives involve creating additional
> >copies of copyrighted materials; that is not the case with a lending
> >library.

does it? what's the legal definition of "copy" as it pertains to 
mailing list archives (hint: there's no legal precedent).

> Section 108 has provisions for making up to three whole copies in 
> specific cases.  Section 108 addresses copyright and copying issues 
> for books and phonorecord items but doesn't address electronic copies 
> of something that doesn't exist at all in "hard copy".  Who knows how 
> it will be interpreted regarding content that has been published 
> *solely* on the Internet.
>

It's like the Bible to Christians, or any other religious document. 
People tend to only quote those pieces that reinforce what they want 
the document to say, and not the pieces that contradict it....


-- 
Chuq Von Rospach, Architech
chuqui@plaidworks.com -- http://www.chuqui.com/

He doesn't have ulcers, but he's a carrier.




References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: The gmane issue
From: Beartooth <karhunhammas@Lserv.com>
Next: Re: The gmane issue
From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: The gmane issue
From: JC Dill <inet-list@vo.cnchost.com>
Next: Copywrong (Was: Re: The gmane issue)
From: Charlie Summers <charlie@lofcom.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com