Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(August 2002)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Copywrong (Was: Re: The gmane issue)
From: Charlie Summers <charlie @ lofcom . com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 19:11:05 -0400
To: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui @ plaidworks . com>
Cc: List-Managers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <455E5000-B3BD-11D6-8294-0003934516A8@plaidworks.com>
References: <v0313031eb987015ef673@[192.168.123.10]>

At 5:47 PM -0400 8/19/02, Chuq Von Rospach is rumored to have typed:

> So don't assume. Make your wishes explicit on material you publish, so
> there's no assumption necessary.

   Why are you so intent on placing the responsibility on the publisher and
not the archiver? It is the ARCHIVER who shouldn't assume, and should simply
ask for and receive permission BEFORE archiving the list. It takes little
time, and places the archive in a completely legal position - what exactly is
it about asking permission that you find so reprehensible?

         Charlie (who is quit with this now)





Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: More tar for the baby (was Re: The gmane issue)
From: Beartooth <karhunhammas@Lserv.com>
Next: Re: Copywrong (Was: Re: The gmane issue)
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Copywrong (Was: Re: The gmane issue)
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
Next: Re: Copywrong (Was: Re: The gmane issue)
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com