On 02:44 PM 8/19/02, Nick Simicich wrote:
>At 11:15 AM 2002-08-19 -0700, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
>
>
>>On Monday, August 19, 2002, at 10:38 AM, Norbert Bollow wrote:
>>>Actually I believe that such a responsibility exists only where
>>>the list-owners want the situation to be different from the default
>>>that is implied by copyright law, namely:
>>>
>>>* Without explicit permission, no-one is allowed to mirror the list,
>>> or create public archives.
>
>1. There are two issues here. One is the individual poster's implied
>permission. It is my belief that, barring a statement that changes
>expectations, that the original posted has not implied that their posting
>can be copied to archives other than the ones that are associated with the
>list mechanics.
Sure they have. I have a complete archive of list-managers on my hard
drive, including your posts. You SENT them to me (via the list), so
clearly you gave me permission to have a copy and to keep it.
>Someone who establishes an external archive is violating my collection
>copyright, as well as violating the copyrights of the individual authors.
How is my making my archive available for others to see any different than
a library making a magazine subscription available for others to see (read
or borrow)?
jc
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
