Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com> wrote:
> If it in necessary to write an RFC,
Whether necessary or not, a document will get written, and I'll try to
get it accepted as a standards-track RFC.
> it should explicitly say, "By the way,
> it is not acceptable for you to grab messages and archive them unless you
> get permission."
I agree with the sentiment, but this isn't exactly the language that
I'd use in a RFC. :-)
I'd rather put something like:
"""
In particular, if nothing is explicitly specified, then that MUST be
interpreted as equivalent to the following:
List-ArchivePolicy: 1 (ask: permission from the list-owner is needed)
List-GatewayPolicy: 1 (ask: permission from the list-owner is needed)
List-RobotPolicy: 1 (ask: permission from the list-owner is needed)
"""
Are there any objections against this language?
Greetings, Norbert.
--
Founder & Steering Committee member of http://gnu.org/projects/dotgnu/
Norbert Bollow, Weidlistr.18, CH-8624 Gruet (near Zurich, Switzerland)
Tel +41 1 972 20 59 Fax +41 1 972 20 69 http://norbert.ch
List hosting with GNU Mailman on your own domain name http://cisto.com
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
