List-Managers: Re: The gmane issue

List-Managers
(August 2002)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: The gmane issue
From:	Charlie Summers <charlie @ lofcom . com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Aug 2002 13:36:28 -0400
To:	Norbert Bollow <nb @ cisto . com>, List-Managers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to:	<200208201603.g7KG3S824611@quill.local>
References:	<5.1.0.14.2.20020819200112.1565c200@127.0.0.1> (message fromNick Simicich on Mon, 19 Aug 2002 20:35:34 -0400)<5.0.0.25.2.20020819123912.038caaf0@pop3.vo.cnchost.com><5.1.0.14.2.20020819200112.1565c200@127.0.0.1>

At 12:03 PM -0400 8/20/02, Norbert Bollow is rumored to have typed:

> Are there any objections against this language?

   Looks fine to me; so long as someone asks permission when not explicitly
granted permission (at which point I may make my wishes known and decide
based on the list, the archive, etc.) I can't see where anyone (ok, maybe
one) could object.

         Charlie

References:

Re: The gmane issue
From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
Re: The gmane issue
From: JC Dill <inet-list@vo.cnchost.com>
Re: The gmane issue
From: Norbert Bollow <nb@cisto.com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: The gmane issue From: Norbert Bollow <nb@cisto.com>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: The gmane issue From: Thomas Gramstad <thomas@ifi.uio.no>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: The gmane issue From: Norbert Bollow <nb@cisto.com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: The gmane issue From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>