Jeffrey Goldberg <jeffrey@goldmark.org> wrote:
> Could you put some kind of version number or last modify time on that
> so that we know whether we are commenting on the same draft.
Done. You will now find properly-numbered and dated drafts
at http://maillist.info/rfc-draft/
> I'm wondering if we want finer distinctions than just the four listed.
I think that we need to be very careful that we don't raise the
barrier to learning the proposed system so high that very few would
bother about it. Also, won't those list-owners who want to exercise
fine distinctions want to be asked anyway so that they can personally
decide whether they want that particular archive / mirror / robot ?
> And whether a multidigit code would be better ala SMTP response codes.
If we adopt a multidigit code, it should have two digits or four, not
three -- so that it won't get confused with SMTP and HTTP response
codes.
Greetings, Norbert.
--
Founder & Steering Committee member of http://gnu.org/projects/dotgnu/
Norbert Bollow, Weidlistr.18, CH-8624 Gruet (near Zurich, Switzerland)
Tel +41 1 972 20 59 Fax +41 1 972 20 69 http://norbert.ch
List hosting with GNU Mailman on your own domain name http://cisto.com
|
|
