Nick Simicich <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> "then that" is not reasonable English, as there is no antecedent for that
> in this case. Maybe the antecedent would become apparent if there were
> more context, but sentences in RFCs tend to get misinterpreted if they
> can't stand on their own.
Thank you for pointing this out. Fixed (hopefully! :-) by essentially
adopting your proposed language.
The revised version is http://maillist.info/rfc-draft/draft0.03.txt
Founder & Steering Committee member of http://gnu.org/projects/dotgnu/
Norbert Bollow, Weidlistr.18, CH-8624 Gruet (near Zurich, Switzerland)
Tel +41 1 972 20 59 Fax +41 1 972 20 69 http://norbert.ch
List hosting with GNU Mailman on your own domain name http://cisto.com