On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
> I don't think anybody has put anything like that together since
> reconfirmation is so rare. but I suppose that if you wanted to
> do it, you might make the reconfirmation progressive. Fist
> reconfirmation 3 month's after subscription, second one 6 months
> after first. Third and subsequent ones, as annual.
Good idea; I'll bear that in mind. Thanks!
> Do your users really want the reconfirmation? Do you?
Dunno if they do; I do, yes.
I go to every length I can think of against spam; but I do
occasionally invite individuals to subscribe, and *not* get
reconfirmations at the next cycle, despite my assurance when I put
them on that they're welcome to drop on or off at any time, for any
reason or no reason.
Put it that I have a horror of ranting where I'm not
welcome. I can do it, if I see need, but I do have a horror of it.
--
RR 'Beartooth' Neuswanger <karhunhammas (at) lserv.com>
In a just world, spammers would be exterminated.
Telephone spammers would take every living relative along --
verily, unto the third and fourth generation ....
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
