Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(February 2003)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Majordomo hole my rear end!
From: Nick Simicich <njs @ scifi . squawk . com>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 15:06:39 -0500
To: Istvan Berkeley <istvan @ louisiana . edu>,list-managers <list-managers @ greatcircle . com>
In-reply-to: <3E43E2FF.1070208@louisiana.edu>

At 10:46 AM 2003-02-07 -0600, Istvan Berkeley wrote:

>Hi there,
>There is a report of a major security hole in most versions of Majordomo 
>available at http://www.net-security.org/vuln.php?id=2416
>I suggest folks get on top of this, otherwise the evil spammers may make 
>our lives even more hellish.

This is total bullshit.  Someone got on the MJ2 list with this crap a few 
days ago and irritated everyone there - they were going to publish a "alert".

Hey, I will publish a major security alert, which affects every system:  If 
you have a weak password, someone can guess it, log in and steal your 
data!  Here is another security alert:  You are subject to data loss 
because few systems are strong enough to resist being struck by lightning 
or being smashed by a concrete block!

  A "major" security hole would be, "Someone can break into your system 
because you are running Majordomo", or "Majordomo can be used to relay a 
worm".  This is actually:  The default for "which" is open, and it has been 
for 10 years now, so someone can extract e-mail addresses from your system 
unless you have closed it.  It is the default because Majordomo was 
designed in a kinder, gentler day, and everyone who cares changes the 
default.  As described in the "alert", it is a case of "RTFDOC".  Guess 
what?  You should not be running a MLM *unless* you read the doc, and the 
Mj2 leads you through a set of defaults that they suggest you review for 
applicability when you set up a new list, and one of them is this one, the 
default for which.

You know, I have another alert:  You might have meant for no one to sign up 
for this list, but the default is to let people sign up!  The most 
restrictive defaults should be picked in all cases, of course, so the 
default should be to not let people sign up!  And to not let people use the 
list at all!  And to restrict all English words from being in a posting, 
because if people are allowed to use language in mailing list postings, 
they could accidentally give away secrets!

Lots of people have open archives, some, by policy, however misguided, 
require that their subscriber lists are public.  These defaults are 
perfectly appropriate, and, if the reporter had actually bothered to use 
Majordomo2, they would have understood the process.

This is known and has been well known for a number of years.  It is only 
being described as a major hole by someone who wants to inflate their 
self-importance.

--
SPAM: Trademark for spiced, chopped ham manufactured by Hormel.
spam: Unsolicited, Bulk E-mail, where e-mail can be interpreted generally 
to mean electronic messages designed to be read by an individual, and it 
can include Usenet, SMS, AIM, etc.  But if it is not all three of 
Unsolicited, Bulk, and E-mail, it simply is not spam. Misusing the term 
plays into the hands of the spammers, since it causes confusion, and 
spammers thrive on  confusion. Spam is not speech, it is an action, like 
theft, or vandalism. If you were not confused, would you patronize a spammer?
Nick Simicich - njs@scifi.squawk.com - http://scifi.squawk.com/njs.html
Stop by and light up the world!


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Majordomo hole
From: Jeffrey Goldberg <jeffrey@goldmark.org>
Next: Re: Majordomo hole my rear end!
From: Mitch Collinsworth <mitch@ccmr.cornell.edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Majordomo hole
From: Jeffrey Goldberg <jeffrey@goldmark.org>
Next: Re: Majordomo hole my rear end!
From: Mitch Collinsworth <mitch@ccmr.cornell.edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com