Unless the network is lying to me again, JC Dill said:
> I've read about *many* legitimate opt-in discussion lists that have been
> blocked at AOL, and the onerous contract AOL wants list owners to sign
> to be unblocked. In one case, the contract stated that if you signed it
> you couldn't disclose it. A list owner discussed this *proposed*
> contract with his lawyer and they determined that if he *didn't* sign
> it, he *could* disclose the terms of the contract, and that's what he
> did. It's out there on the web somewhere. It is a very depressing
> story, he had to let his AOL subscribers lose so that the rest of us
> could know what AOL was up to (and may still be up to, who knows?).
That would be me: http://www.mailinglists.org/aol
AlanC {who has sent mail to the EFF address already}
--
I must study politics and war that my sons |
may have liberty to study mathematics and | alan@clegg.com
philosophy. -- John Adams |
Attachment:
pgp00022.pgp
Description: PGP signature
References:
|
|
