Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
>>>>>>"RBAK" == Roger B A Klorese <rogerk@queernet.org> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>
> RBAK> Well over 90% of the mail I get at my personal addresses is
> RBAK> spam, but so far, I haven't seen a solution -- TMDA,
> RBAK> Brightmail, SpamAssassin, whatever -- that seemed like any
> RBAK> less a hassle than just deleting it.
>
>spambayes.sf.net is another option that has had a lot of success for
>personal inboxes. It's got a pop3 proxy (WIBNI someone wrote an imap
>proxy? :) that is pretty decent.
>
>
I still need to check it. So since I am biased to believe it is right
and therefore might be misled to miss a false positive, it's a bad
idea. Anything less than 100% accurate on the positive side is less
than worthless to me -- it's destructive.
References:
|
|
