Tom Neff wrote:
>Spamprobe (Brian Burton) is worth it.
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/spamprobe/
>
>Since installing it I have to delete one or two spams per day - that's it.
>Meanwhile the spamprobe folder collects hundreds of spams per day.
>
Again: one false positive makes ANY technique not worth it -- because it
prejudices me to believe the message is spam, making me even more likely
to skip it.
>I spam protect my lists by making them members only. Simplest most effective
>technique I've found.
>
>
Doesn't work very well when a spammer subscribes, which happens often on
our adult-content lists.
References:
|
|
