Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(March 2003)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Questions for those who have this information
From: J C Lawrence <claw @ kanga . nu>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 10:04:54 -0800
To: Vivek Khera <khera @ kcilink . com>
Cc: list-managers @ GreatCircle . com (List Managers)
In-reply-to: Message from Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com> of "Mon, 03 Mar 2003 11:20:35 EST." <15971.32979.395554.970962@onceler.int.kciLink.com>
References: <20030302165032.31605.qmail@celery.tssi.com> <15971.32979.395554.970962@onceler.int.kciLink.com>

On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:20:35 -0500 
Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com> wrote:

> I disagree.  DSN's report the final recipient, not necessarily the
> address that is in your mailing list.

Quite.  Many things would be far more useful if alias translations were
reported in the Received: headers.  (I do it here under Exim, which
makes filtering mail from multiple sources (eg root, webmaster,
postmaster, newsmaster, listmaster, etc) far easier.

-- 
J C Lawrence                
---------(*)                Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. 
claw@kanga.nu               He lived as a devil, eh?		  
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/  Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Sendmail Security Announcement
From: Richard Rognlie <rrognlie@gamerz.net>
Next: Re: Questions for those who have this information
From: James M Galvin <galvin+list-managers@eListX.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Questions for those who have this information
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
Next: Re: Questions for those who have this information
From: James M Galvin <galvin+list-managers@eListX.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com