Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(March 2003)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: List software (was: Re: warning: spamming confirmed opt-in
From: Bob Bish <bobbish @ earthlink . net>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 21:05:46 -0700
To: list-managers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <81311265.1046728732@[192.168.254.79]>
References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030303193728.02b1cd18@pop.earthlink.net><5.2.0.9.2.20030303182412.02af04d8@pop.earthlink.net><5.1.0.14.0.20030303170910.02c497e0@mail.attbi.com><5.2.0.9.2.20030303160346.00bb4440@pop.earthlink.net><5.1.0.14.0.20030303125840.0224a190@mail.attbi.com><20030303203216.14391.qmail@celery.tssi.com><5.2.0.9.2.20030303193728.02b1cd18@pop.earthlink.net>

    Those who manage mailing lists must certainly understand how the 
written word can be read very differently by different people.
    OK, I'm clear on the scope of this list.  Since it does encompass any 
and all kinds of list software, my original suggestion (from which we've 
strayed a bit) becomes even more valid.
    Many, if not most, day-to-day list maintenance issues are 
software-specific.  If posters would specify the software used, it would 
avoid irrelevant questions like mine and save a lot of bandwidth from the 
resulting tangential threads.

...Bob



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: warning: spamming confirmed opt-in lists
From: murr rhame <murr@vnet.net>
Next: Re: warning: spamming confirmed opt-in lists
From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: List software (was: Re: warning: spamming confirmed opt-in
From: Tom Neff <tneff@grassyhill.net>
Next: Re: List software (was: Re: warning: spamming confirmed opt-in
From: Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com