Tom Neff followed up,
| See if you can read this:
|
| .,.._...,_,..,,
| _,X..,,_,,X,_,.
| .,,X_,.,.X.,,..
| .,..X,..X..._..
| .,,,.X,X.+...,,
| ,,,_.,X,_,.;.,.
| .,,..X,X._._.,.
| _,,.X,..X,,,.,,
| _,,X.,,,.X,;.,,
| .,X,._,..,X._,,
| .,,,._.,.,...,.
In a fixed-pitch font it's plain as day. In a proportional one, all bets are
off. You could restrict your characters to those of almost the same width but
varying densities,
<_?<_?<_+<_?<_?
=_#########<_?_
<_?><_?=_#<_?=_
<_?_+<_?#<_+<_?
<_+=_>_#<_?<_?_
<_?<_?#<_?<_+=_
<_?=_#_~<_+<_?_
<_?_#<_+=<_?<_?
<_+#<_?=_~<_?=_
=_#########<_?_
<_?<_=<_?<_+<_?
and maybe pull that off. It still won't work for Roger's blind subscribers,
and neither does the .jpg-of-a-word method.
References:
|
|
