Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(May 2003)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: So I got this 411 spam this morning...
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui @ plaidworks . com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 08:16:09 -0700
To: Charlie Summers <charlie @ lofcom . com>
Cc: list-managers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <v0313034abad6ca20b984@[192.168.123.10]>


On Thursday, May 1, 2003, at 06:04  AM, Charlie Summers wrote:

>    Is it likely that some spammer joined this list to harvest  
> addresses? I
> doubt it. More likely, the scum simply harvested them from one of the
> web-based archives (Yahoo! comes to mind). But it's sure annoying...
>
They don't need to bother. List-managers makes it easy:

http://www.google.com/search?q=list-managers+charlie@lofcom.com&ie=UTF- 
8&oe=UTF-8

you're in google, unprotected, thanks to the archives. All of us are.

I recently brought this up with mcb, since someone I had cc:ed to a  
message I sent to the list asked about getting his address out of  
greatcircle's archives. That didn't go very far, unfortunately.

This is why I put my archives behind a security realm years ago. This  
is why I'm (too slowly) working on a new archiving scheme that'll cloak  
email addresses and phone numbers in public archives. Once I get my own  
archives up to snuff and make my tools available, I'll be starting to  
leave lists that don't protect user's information in archives for the  
same reason I won't be on lists that don't protect the posting address  
from spammers.

Any mail list that makes its archives open and unprotected is handing  
its subscribers to the spammers through the search engine. We're at the  
time (past the time, actually) where that's no longer acceptable. I'm  
working on tools that'll help solve that problem, but way too slowly  
for my taste (life takes precedence right now), but I think every list  
owner has to realize what they're doing to their  subscribers by doing  
this, and decide what their policy ought to be.

I'm a firm believer in public archives in the search engines as a  
marketing/advertising tool for attracting new users, but I also believe  
list subscribers need privacy from the spambots. I'm trying to find my  
compromise, and I hope once I do others will find it useful as well.  
But it's a problem I don't think we can ignore, and unfortunately, the  
list that the list admins live on is one of the archives on the  
"problem" list, not the "solution" list.

Might as well hand over the subscriber list to the spammers.  
Effectively, that's what list-managers has done to anyone who's ever  
posted to this list, or been referred to in one of its emails.




Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: So I got this 411 spam this morning...
From: Charlie Summers <charlie@lofcom.com>
Next: Re: So I got this 411 spam this morning...
From: Tom Neff <tneff@grassyhill.net>
Indexed By Thread Previous: So I got this 411 spam this morning...
From: Charlie Summers <charlie@lofcom.com>
Next: Re: So I got this 411 spam this morning...
From: Tom Neff <tneff@grassyhill.net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com