Is it possible that the header information might be inviting the "on Vacation" message?
I spoke with one systems administrator who said that my messages were being received with PRECEDENCE=NORMAL, and the sysadmin uses that to gauge who gets an auto-responder.
If messages arrive with PRECEDENCE=LIST or PRECEDENCE=BULK then their system is set to NOT auto-respond. I have since configured my list as PRECEDENCE=LIST and that made that particular systems administer
happy.
OTOH, my software seems to filter those automated messages, so it's not really been an issue for me.
-- Rick
At 11:08 AM 8/13/03 -0700, JC Dil wrote:
>At 10:39 AM 8/13/2003, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
>>Consider how it scales. Assume that at any given time, maybe 5% of your
>>list are "on vacation".
>
>Heh. This is a list for people who work at ISPs. In the 5 years I've been
>administrating this list we have had a problem with an autoresponder
>maybe once a year. For the most part, ISP folks just don't take vacation,
> [Portion deleted for brevity]
>_______________________[ End ]_______________________
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
