At 02:50 PM 8/13/2003, The Rick of RixLists wrote:
>Is it possible that the header information might be inviting the "on
>Vacation" message?
>
>I spoke with one systems administrator who said that my messages were
>being received with PRECEDENCE=NORMAL, and the sysadmin uses that to
>gauge who gets an auto-responder.
>
>If messages arrive with PRECEDENCE=LIST
The list uses the
Precedence: list
header, as well as several List- headers. There is no reason for a
properly configured vacation program to treat the list email as "normal" email.
jc
>At 11:08 AM 8/13/03 -0700, JC Dil wrote:
> >At 10:39 AM 8/13/2003, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
> >>Consider how it scales. Assume that at any given time, maybe 5% of your
> >>list are "on vacation".
> >
> >Heh. This is a list for people who work at ISPs. In the 5 years I've been
> >administrating this list we have had a problem with an autoresponder
> >maybe once a year. For the most part, ISP folks just don't take vacation,
> > [Portion deleted for brevity]
> >_______________________[ End ]_______________________
References:
|
|
