Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(November 2004)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: mailing with sendmail binary / errors
From: lee <davislee @ btinternet . com>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 00:20:56 +0000
To: list-managers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <418EB874.9060008@mnjazz.com>
References: <418A6C87.2070600@btinternet.com> <20041104194912.GA16075@eskimo.com> <418A918A.6010300@btinternet.com> <1099843855.2393.2141.camel@quickdraw.squawk.com> <418E8BE9.5010406@btinternet.com> <418E9F00.9090502@mnjazz.com> <418EB440.4080406@btinternet.com> <418EB874.9060008@mnjazz.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803)


hello again Al and everyone,

(see * below for my replies)

Al Iverson wrote:

>
> If I understand correctly, the issue is bounces being distributed to 
> list members, yes?

> * Yes, that's right.

> Is the list locked so that only members can post? Verified by email 
> address?

   * Yes, indeed so.

>
>
> Can you post one of those bounces to a text file, just like you did 
> with the example post?

   * I don't have one to hand at present, but could generate one. They 
appear to be the same kind of mail delivery failure notifications that 
you would receive from a personal mail to a dead or over quota address, 
for example. The majority of the error mails I'm referring to appear to 
be posted by the mail daemon on the list hosting's site. A smaller 
amount appear to come directly from the mail daemon of the failing address.

>
> My thoughts would be to change the return path as to not be the list 
> posting address, or to change the list so that only members may post.

    * Yes, I'm trying to create the option to change the Return-Path (or 
at least force in an overall specific one for all lists) with my 
previously described efforts. It's these coding efforts I've reached a 
dead end with because I have taken my non-knowledge of php to the utmost 
limit !

> If you're still seeing the issues after that happens, then it feels 
> like you have some list members with a wonky MTA or MUA that is doing 
> some bad stuff. I see that often enough on our mailings (avg 1-2 mil a 
> day) that we had to put some extensive automation in place to handle 
> misdirected bounces, as well as the usual other garbage like out of 
> office replies.

    * Absolutely, once I've achieved my aims above I can assess the 
issue (I'm already aware of) where some mail servers don't acknowledge 
the actual desired Return-Path.

>
> It could also be caused by some poorly-designed spam filter, that's 
> helpfully trying to bounce perceived spam, but is parsing the headers 
> wrong and sending it to the wrong person (though in a situation like 
> that, there's really not a right person to send it to; a spam filter 
> like that does little more than pound innocents with misdirected spam 
> and bounces). 

   * Sure, presumably a real possibility.

   * Many thanks again for anything further,

   * Lee


-- 
*The latest fine-tuning of * LEE'S FREE MUSIC STATION 
<http://music.uk.launch.yahoo.com/lc/?rt=0&rp1=0&rp2=1453474498>   *means
even bigger hits, pop and dance - less fillers than ever before*

scanned by lee's virus software. outbound message found to be clean.





References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: mailing with sendmail binary / errors
From: Al Iverson <iverson@mnjazz.com>
Next: Re: mailing with sendmail binary / errors
From: "Derek Cosby" <drcoz@aol.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: mailing with sendmail binary / errors
From: Al Iverson <iverson@mnjazz.com>
Next: Re: mailing with sendmail binary / errors
From: "Derek Cosby" <drcoz@aol.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com