Sounds like a rather clever system you have going on there, Jim.
I certainly agree that digests become a pretty bad mess, due to the
replying and quoting issues we've been discussing.
I suppose I've taken a 'well, can't do much about that' attitude, and
just accept that digests will contain fiendish amounts of repetition.
By the way, does anyone use a MLM which 'threads' in a digest? ie
sequencing by virtue of subject title. This would make following a
thread easier but of course still excessively cluttered.
I'm assuming 'digest threading' isn't generally performed by mlm's, or
maybe just the ones I've used don't do it ... ?
Jim Osborn wrote:
> I chose to roll my own procmail-based filters, not to bounce
> submissions but to clean up the distributions, and I apply those
> filters just to my digest.
Jim, how do you apply the filters to only the digest? Just curious, as
I'm assuming you wouldn't have a separate pipe in place to feed just the
digester processing ... presumably you've hacked your mlm and integrated
your filters into its digest processing?
thanks,
lee
--
A perfect internet companion: LEE'S FREE MUSIC STATION
<http://uk.music.yahoo.com/lc/?rt=0&rp1=0&rp2=1453474498>
Example recent playlist HERE <http://www.incelsite.com/playlist.gif>
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
