From majordomo-users-owner@greatcircle.com Tue May 15 05:17:55 2007 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.236]) by mycroft.greatcircle.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0874F21BD5B for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 05:17:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id o37so125171nzf for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 05:17:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ndiVj3amYrVik01N0r9o+Nsqi3dBbCLvDY0XV0gSjS42N4LEuRaBGjCdbMe3mv+D3DjCG9/OxSolDnBiwhe0a6owpVS0F0Qx9/4DzlTw6X79YJCFCPOsD/NDaZaJJ1yTodPYUMlZTPhHeIfv7l8rdpVGJ+PqMCg/wNac1rkNMAA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Y6/b5GJZIWS4pkCL8pyN1rnAP4ugOeFP2c7FICg/7EEMgAVAbtvrEtcj1fL+9DkxEZ62UdIjvPjPBWi/evGZXIUub6ntbAYQ7zmYSp8t1YlAIPcO859y55CyuwjlkNcMszcOPjkNwvUq5jmnvJA+KjrBWU6pp7ZIdKQgzKT5OT0= Received: by 10.65.40.16 with SMTP id s16mr526998qbj.1179231470342; Tue, 15 May 2007 05:17:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.184.18 with HTTP; Tue, 15 May 2007 05:17:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3c9b77c60705150517y789a718bjaa09c591e8bf160d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:17:50 +0300 From: "Clement Gitonga" To: Majordomo-Users@greatcircle.com Subject: Re: Can't find majorcool In-Reply-To: <3c9b77c60705150258s6105ad34mf24d50e54139a6c5@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_605_12930003.1179231470257" References: <3c9b77c60705150258s6105ad34mf24d50e54139a6c5@mail.gmail.com> X-Archive-Number: 200705/1 X-Sequence-Number: 5618 ------=_Part_605_12930003.1179231470257 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 5/15/07, Clement Gitonga wrote: > > hey people, I'm new to majordomo and I'm in the process of exploring it. > Now I need to download the majorcool web interface but when I go to > conveyanced site and try to download, I'm redirected to an advertising site. > does anyone know where else I can get it? Any help will be highly > appreciated. > > -- > Never miss an opportunity to be great. -- Never miss an opportunity to be great. ------=_Part_605_12930003.1179231470257 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

On 5/15/07, Clement Gitonga <cgitosh@gmail.com> wrote:
hey people, I'm new to majordomo and I'm in the process of exploring it. Now I need to download the majorcool web interface but when I go to conveyanced site and try to download, I'm redirected to an advertising site. does anyone know where else I can get it? Any help will be highly appreciated.

--
Never miss an opportunity to be great.



--
Never miss an opportunity to be great. ------=_Part_605_12930003.1179231470257-- From majordomo-users-owner@greatcircle.com Tue May 15 10:25:45 2007 X-Greylist: delayed 898 seconds by postgrey-1.24 at mycroft; Tue, 15 May 2007 10:25:42 PDT Received: from cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us [147.144.1.212]) by mycroft.greatcircle.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0C621BE47 for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 10:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jjah@localhost) by cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (8.11.6/8.11.2) with ESMTP id l4FHAbE14798; Tue, 15 May 2007 10:10:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 10:10:37 -0700 (PDT) From: "Joe R. Jah" To: Clement Gitonga cc: Majordomo-Users@greatcircle.com Subject: Re: Can't find majorcool In-Reply-To: <3c9b77c60705150517y789a718bjaa09c591e8bf160d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Archive-Number: 200705/2 X-Sequence-Number: 5619 On Tue, 15 May 2007, Clement Gitonga wrote: > Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:17:50 +0300 > From: Clement Gitonga > To: Majordomo-Users@greatcircle.com > Subject: Re: Can't find majorcool > > On 5/15/07, Clement Gitonga wrote: > > > > hey people, I'm new to majordomo and I'm in the process of exploring it. > > Now I need to download the majorcool web interface but when I go to > > conveyanced site and try to download, I'm redirected to an advertising site. > > does anyone know where else I can get it? Any help will be highly > > appreciated. ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/majordomo-contrib/majorcool-1.3.2.tar.gz Regards, Joe -- _/ _/_/_/ _/ ____________ __o _/ _/ _/ _/ ______________ _-\<,_ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ......(_)/ (_) _/_/ oe _/ _/. _/_/ ah jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us From majordomo-users-owner@greatcircle.com Fri May 18 00:13:02 2007 X-Greylist: delayed 1143 seconds by postgrey-1.24 at mycroft; Fri, 18 May 2007 00:13:00 PDT Received: from smtp2.stanford.edu (smtp2.Stanford.EDU [171.67.20.25]) by mycroft.greatcircle.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2106321BD55 for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 00:13:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp2.stanford.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 01BC74BFE5 for ; Thu, 17 May 2007 23:53:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tantivy.tantivy.net (tantivy.Stanford.EDU [171.66.118.251]) by smtp2.stanford.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30424DD95 for ; Thu, 17 May 2007 23:53:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tantivy.tantivy.net (techie@localhost.stanford.edu [127.0.0.1]) by tantivy.tantivy.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l4I6rbQb069892 for ; Thu, 17 May 2007 23:53:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from techie@tantivy.tantivy.net) Received: (from techie@localhost) by tantivy.tantivy.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l4I6ra1I069891 for majordomo-users@greatcircle.com; Thu, 17 May 2007 23:53:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from techie) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 23:53:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Bob Vaughan Message-Id: <200705180653.l4I6ra1I069891@tantivy.tantivy.net> To: majordomo-users@greatcircle.com Subject: un5ub5cribe_policy question X-Archive-Number: 200705/3 X-Sequence-Number: 5620 Pardon the munging.. the previous attempt vanished into the ether. The example config seems to indicate that setting un5ub5cribe_policy to auto+confirm will send a confirmation email to the requestor if the requested address does not match the 5ub5sribed address, but not if they match. from config_parse.pl: 'un5ub5cribe_policy', "One of three values: open, closed, auto; plus an optional modifier: '+confirm'. Open allows people to un5ub5cribe themselves from the list. Auto allows anybody to un5ub5cribe anybody to the list without maintainer approval. The existence of the file .auto is the same as specifying the value auto. Closed requires maintainer approval for all un5ub5cribe requests to the list. In addition to the keyword, if the file .closed exists, it is the same as specifying the value closed. Adding '+confirm', ie, 'auto+confirm', will cause majordomo to send a reply back to the 5ub5criber if the request didn't come from the 5ub5criber. The reply includes a authentication number which must be sent back in with another 5ub5cribe command. The value of this keyword overrides the value supplied by any existent files.", However, it dose't appear to work as advertised. Is this a known problem, or is there something I am missing? -- Welcome My Son, Welcome To The Machine -- Bob Vaughan | techie @ tantivy.net | | P.O. Box 19792, Stanford, Ca 94309 | -- I am Me, I am only Me, And no one else is Me, What could be simpler? -- From majordomo-users-owner@greatcircle.com Tue May 22 13:11:47 2007 X-Greylist: delayed 358 seconds by postgrey-1.24 at mycroft; Tue, 22 May 2007 13:11:46 PDT Received: from femailcop.bard.edu (femailcop.bard.edu [192.246.229.46]) by mycroft.greatcircle.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224C421BD8B for ; Tue, 22 May 2007 13:11:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (midlbro.bard.edu [10.20.30.14]) by femailcop.bard.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l4MK4FVv030003; Tue, 22 May 2007 16:04:20 -0400 (envelope-from draves@bard.edu) Message-ID: <46534CDD.9090204@bard.edu> Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 16:04:45 -0400 From: Richard Draves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070222 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Vaughan , majordomo-users@greatcircle.com Subject: Re: un5ub5cribe_policy question References: <200705180653.l4I6ra1I069891@tantivy.tantivy.net> In-Reply-To: <200705180653.l4I6ra1I069891@tantivy.tantivy.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000742-1, 05/22/2007), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Archive-Number: 200705/4 X-Sequence-Number: 5621 We are using Majordomo 1.94.5 I have further observed with a setting of closed - meaning that the owner should be the ONLY remover of addresses, that an individual can successfully remove themselves without the owner. And it doesn't seem to matter about the presence of .closed either. Bob Vaughan wrote: > Pardon the munging.. the previous attempt vanished into the ether. > > > The example config seems to indicate that setting un5ub5cribe_policy to auto+confirm > will send a confirmation email to the requestor if the requested address does not > match the 5ub5sribed address, but not if they match. > > from config_parse.pl: > > 'un5ub5cribe_policy', > "One of three values: open, closed, auto; plus an optional modifier: > '+confirm'. Open allows people to un5ub5cribe themselves from the > list. Auto allows anybody to un5ub5cribe anybody to the list without > maintainer approval. The existence of the file .auto is the > same as specifying the value auto. Closed requires maintainer > approval for all un5ub5cribe requests to the list. In addition to the > keyword, if the file .closed exists, it is the same as > specifying the value closed. Adding '+confirm', ie, 'auto+confirm', > will cause majordomo to send a reply back to the 5ub5criber if the > request didn't come from the 5ub5criber. The reply includes a > authentication number which must be sent back in with another > 5ub5cribe command. The value of this keyword overrides the value > supplied by any existent files.", > > > However, it dose't appear to work as advertised. > > Is this a known problem, or is there something I am missing? > > > > -- Welcome My Son, Welcome To The Machine -- > Bob Vaughan | techie @ tantivy.net | > | P.O. Box 19792, Stanford, Ca 94309 | > -- I am Me, I am only Me, And no one else is Me, What could be simpler? -- > -- Have a Good Day Dick Draves System Administrator Bard College 845-758-7119 From majordomo-users-owner@greatcircle.com Tue May 22 16:36:33 2007 Received: from cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us [147.144.1.212]) by mycroft.greatcircle.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6709B21BD99 for ; Tue, 22 May 2007 16:36:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jjah@localhost) by cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (8.11.6/8.11.2) with ESMTP id l4MNa3d14784; Tue, 22 May 2007 16:36:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 16:36:03 -0700 (PDT) From: "Joe R. Jah" To: Richard Draves cc: Bob Vaughan , majordomo-users@greatcircle.com Subject: Re: un5ub5cribe_policy question In-Reply-To: <46534CDD.9090204@bard.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Archive-Number: 200705/5 X-Sequence-Number: 5622 On Tue, 22 May 2007, Richard Draves wrote: > Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 16:04:45 -0400 > From: Richard Draves > To: Bob Vaughan , majordomo-users@greatcircle.com > Subject: Re: un5ub5cribe_policy question > > We are using Majordomo 1.94.5 > > I have further observed with a setting of closed - meaning that the > owner should be the ONLY remover of addresses, that an individual can > successfully remove themselves without the owner. And it doesn't seem to > matter about the presence of .closed either. See: ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/majordomo-patches/1.94.5/majordomo.5 And: http://www.greatcircle.com/lists/majordomo-users/mhonarc/majordomo-users.200009/msg00179.html > Bob Vaughan wrote: > > Pardon the munging.. the previous attempt vanished into the ether. > > > > > > The example config seems to indicate that setting un5ub5cribe_policy to auto+confirm > > will send a confirmation email to the requestor if the requested address does not > > match the 5ub5sribed address, but not if they match. > > > > from config_parse.pl: > > > > 'un5ub5cribe_policy', > > "One of three values: open, closed, auto; plus an optional modifier: > > '+confirm'. Open allows people to un5ub5cribe themselves from the > > list. Auto allows anybody to un5ub5cribe anybody to the list without > > maintainer approval. The existence of the file .auto is the > > same as specifying the value auto. Closed requires maintainer > > approval for all un5ub5cribe requests to the list. In addition to the > > keyword, if the file .closed exists, it is the same as > > specifying the value closed. Adding '+confirm', ie, 'auto+confirm', > > will cause majordomo to send a reply back to the 5ub5criber if the > > request didn't come from the 5ub5criber. The reply includes a > > authentication number which must be sent back in with another > > 5ub5cribe command. The value of this keyword overrides the value > > supplied by any existent files.", > > > > > > However, it dose't appear to work as advertised. > > > > Is this a known problem, or is there something I am missing? > > > > > > > > -- Welcome My Son, Welcome To The Machine -- > > Bob Vaughan | techie @ tantivy.net | > > | P.O. Box 19792, Stanford, Ca 94309 | > > -- I am Me, I am only Me, And no one else is Me, What could be simpler? -- > > > > -- > Have a Good Day > > Dick Draves > System Administrator > Bard College > > 845-758-7119 From majordomo-users-owner@greatcircle.com Fri May 25 13:16:26 2007 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.228]) by mycroft.greatcircle.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E445F19CDF8 for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 13:16:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s17so738951wxc for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 13:16:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:x-mimeole; b=cydELnlh+AmDroMBweTaPswLOQkz9fTsWzCNICz1r4Ghs7hkF1f3w/Ek0eJijdhCBOG4VS/EEe5QDkRn+cnMAWDZjt3QXgfbsx7alszxDVpCvKIoQDOVUcR0ERAVaQtKsFiSB5akETS2LaDfK5nDbyf+MquCyLBFEeHQXvWRwtk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:x-mimeole; b=sNIKNxYWdOKE6RUencIIHRaw4Ztzm68vt97+QHlWbNkJ2+wHs0FJD2Tpzfbz03cz8mE/FwiJa5KzsxnA1Kd+UXGOVkBVm1r5XqGrYRXquRLiUAlAO+u4MrB2XJFzy+4hrOOSDn+8p/TkUoJ0wucgCZnA9fMlvzTXV8UQ7lDie0g= Received: by 10.70.23.1 with SMTP id 1mr4601987wxw.1180124183344; Fri, 25 May 2007 13:16:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mommy ( [24.218.212.205]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c53sm3694826wrc.2007.05.25.13.16.22; Fri, 25 May 2007 13:16:22 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ellen Basch" To: Subject: Approving posts with outlook Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 16:15:47 -0400 Message-ID: <005b01c79f09$7cb69110$6701a8c0@mommy> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcefCXsJ955dc1AuRcuqezqd7WhhWw== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 X-Archive-Number: 200705/6 X-Sequence-Number: 5623 I am the administrator of a majordomo list on a server that I don't have access to. I had been using outlook 200 for bout 3 years to approve and post messages with very few problems. About a month ago, I upgraded to Outlook 2003 and now realize that I can no longer post in html without issues with encoding (since, as I understand it, majordomo likes plain text). So, I have turned automatic encoding off, I have turned off removal of extra breaks in plain text and I am using only plain text but I am still having problems with invalid approval headers and with the messages being posted containing the following information from the list server: silver.ci.lexington.ma.us id RAA12664 Sender: owner-clarke-announcements@silver.ci.lexington.ma.us Precedence: bulk I never got these before and aside from my messages now looking crappy, they also have this at the beginning. Can anyone with some experience with outlook 2003 tell me what header information I can safely remove when a message comes to me for approval and/or any other helpful tips for formatting. I can't seem to find this sort of information on the internet in spite of having searched around for the last two days. Any help would be very much appreciated! Ellen