Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(September 1993)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: enhancement to 'who list' ?
From: Gene Rackow <rackow @ mcs . anl . gov>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1993 09:11:58 -0500
To: cball @ bu . edu, majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
Cc: amillar @ bolis . sf-bay . org, vds7789 @ aw101 . iasl . ca . boeing . com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 21 Sep 1993 08:56:18 EDT." <Pine.3.07.9309210853.A5180-a100000@itc>

There are multiple reasons not to use the expn command.

 The expn command of smtp is that it is not supported by all 
systems.  Also how to configure the expn command to access the 
sub-lists, etc.  It may be alot more complex than just the :include 
features as that started this discussion.  What if you have a special 
mailer for mailing list stuff that accesses the lists via modes 
unaccessable to expn. 

Then there is the question of local people on the list that have
.forwards to other locations or local delivery pipes.  These people will
show up via the expn command as  user@some.place.else or a piped string 
of some sort for localdelivery.  When someone wants to unsubscribe from the
list, he needs the address in the file, not the expanded address. 

 If you support the expn part of the sendmail, why bother with a
private list?  If you are on the net, anyone could just telnet to
the list machine and expn the list.  Blows privacy all to pieces.

--Gene



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: enhancement to 'who list' ?
From: Charles Ball <cball@bu.edu>
Next: RE: enhancement to 'who list' ?
From: billc@pegasus.ATT.COM (WJCarpenter)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: enhancement to 'who list' ?
From: Charles Ball <cball@bu.edu>
Next: Re: enhancement to 'who list' ?
From: Brent Chapman <brent@GreatCircle.COM>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com